Corporate Philanthropy in the New Urban Economy:

 

 

The Role of Business-Nonprofit Realignment
in Regime Politics

 

by

Leonard Nevarez

Department of Sociology

Vassar College

 

Accepted for publication in Urban Affairs Review

November 2000

 

 

REGIME TRADITIONS IN THE RESEARCH SITES

 

I examined corporate philanthropy to community nonprofits in three coastal Southern California communities&endash;Santa Monica, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo&endash;where economic restructuring has recently transformed local economies to different degrees and with different emphases. The most economically vibrant of the three, Santa Monica (1990 pop. 86,905) has a critical mass of entertainment and software firms linked to the greater software and entertainment districts of the Los Angeles metropolis, as well as strength in professional services like health care and architecture.3 Removed from Los Angeles's sprawl by scenic stretches of wilderness and coast, Santa Barbara (1990 pop. 89,200) appears to be reaching the stage of industrial "critical mass" as growth in software, telecommunications, and high-tech medical devices sectors gradually offsets the decline of older, defense-related R&D firms; the area also includes a handful of entertainment firms, mostly independent production companies and post-production studios. The least industrially developed of the three research sites, San Luis Obispo (1990 pop. 41,958) is the seat of a predominantly agricultural county where high-tech entrepreneurs and city officials seek to expand what they acknowledge is a modest base of new software, Internet, and light manufacturing firms (but virtually no entertainment firms).

All three research sites also contain environmental and community amenities that sustain tourism industries and retiree/second home populations. Santa Monica's beachfront district is the location for television's "Baywatch" and a popular commercial/leisure destination for local and international visitors. Santa Barbara combines a Spanish colonial ambiance (architecturally mandated in a Mission Revival motif) with the outdoor recreations and New Age texture of its university-related populations. San Luis Obispo's natural and pastoral landscapes, small town ambiance, and university-based cosmopolitanism have attracted retirees (25% of residents in some communities) and other émigrés from metropolitan regions. Environmental and community amenities, of course, lure more than people seeking leisure. In Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo, they attract firms and freelancers in software and entertainment able to work at long distance from industrial districts due to telecommunications and relative proximity to Silicon Valley and Los Angeles (Nevarez 1999).

Finally, all three sites have progressive urban regimes. Their policy thrusts, which have earned notorious "antibusiness" reputations, range from rent control in Santa Monica toward more middle-class concerns for slow growth and preserving environmental amenities in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo. These progressive regimes sharpen the context for analyzing business activism and philanthropy. My reasoning here is that if the "antibusiness" climate troubled software, entertainment, or tourism companies, then they would mobilize the political activism of the traditional urban business community (Friedland and Palmer 1984, 407; Molotch 1979). Presumably this mobilization would occur at least in part through conventional forms of corporate philanthropy and thereby confirm the null hypothesis scenario running through my analysis.

The civic domain is not the chief arena for progressive regime politics in all three research sites (cf. Ferman 1996). In Santa Monica, that distinction goes to the electoral arena. Since 1977, the Santa Monicans for Renters Rights (SMRR) party has successfully organized and implemented progressive policies in the city, for example, by establishing an elected rent control board and using its city council majority to enact social programs funded by linkages to development projects (Capek and Gilderbloom 1992; Keating 1986). Still, the civic sector farms progressive leaders and policy concerns to SMRR. The city has a "Task Force on the Environment" consisting of leaders from several environmental organizations and is the model program for runoff policies formulated by the locally headquartered Heal the Bay organization. Six neighborhood organizations voice local concerns that tend to center on diminishing open space, reduced parking, increased noise and traffic, and other impacts of Santa Monica's vibrant economy.

In the other two research sites, the civic domain is the chief arena for progressive politics. In Santa Barbara, environmental organizations have articulated and promoted most of the area's environmental/slow growth policies since at least the 1969 Santa Barbara Channel oil spill, when the "Get Oil Out!" organization led the charge for restrictions on offshore oil development (Easton 1972). Similarly, San Luis Obispo's "Mothers For Peace" galvanized national antinuclear protests in the 1970s and local environmentalists in subsequent decades (Epstein 1991). Since then, a number of local environmental nonprofits have channeled activists' energies toward establishing tough land use and environmental regulations; when their efforts have brought them before city or county government, they have effectively used citizens' initiative ballots and electoral referenda.

In all three research sites, certain community nonprofits provide the conservative business community an organizational stronghold that I call the traditional civic arena. In Santa Monica, the boards of local nonprofits like the Chamber of Commerce, the Santa Monica Museum of History, and the Boys and Girls Club have historically provided formal and informal homes for interest groups on the right, who lack a party organization comparable to SMRR. Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo's civic sectors are likewise segregated. The business community cultivates its own civic settings, primarily the chamber of commerce and the United Way.

 

 

NOTES

 

3. Although entertainment has a long history in Los Angeles, firms did not appear in Santa Monica in substantial numbers until the early 1990s, after a recessionary real estate crash triggered corporate migrations from Hollywood proper (Kotkin 1998). Before that, as a local banker told me, "it was tough to bring businesses out here" because Santa Monica "was so far away" from Los Angeles's older business districts. Back to text.

 

 

TO NEXT SECTION

TO PREVIOUS SECTION

TO TABLE OF CONTENTS